How Can Paid Maternity Leave Boost Female Entrepreneurship?

References

1. 1. Adda, J.,
   2. Dustmann, C., and
   3. Stevens, K.

   (2017). The career costs of children. Journal of Political Economy, 125(2), 293–337.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Albanesi, S.,
   2. Olivetti, C., and
   3. Petrongolo, B.

   (2023). Families, labor markets and policies. In S. Lundberg and A. Voena (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of the family. Elsevier.
3. 1. Anderson, D. J.,
   2. Binder, M., and
   3. Krause, K.

   (2002). The motherhood wage penalty: Which mothers pay it and why? American Economic Review, 92(2), 354–358.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Ando, M.

   (2017). How much should we trust regression-kink-design estimates? Empirical Economics, 53(3), 1287–1322.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Andrew, A.,
   2. Bandiera, O.,
   3. Costa-Dias, M., and
   4. Landais, C.

   (2021). Women and men at work (Tech. Rep.).
6. 1. Angelov, N.,
   2. Johansson, P., and
   3. Lindahl, E.

   (2016). Parenthood and the gender gap in pay. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(3), 545–579.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Asai, Y.

   (2015). Parental leave reforms and the employment of new mothers: Quasiexperimental evidence from japan. Labour Economics, 36, 72–83.

   OpenUrl
8. Baggesgaard, Mertz, Ronchi, and Salvestrini. (2021). Early exposure to entrepreneurship and the creation of female entrepreneurs.
9. 1. Bana, S.,
   2. Bedard, K., and
   3. Rossin-Slater, M.

   (2020). The impacts of paid family leave benefits: Regression kink evidence from california administrative data. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(4), 888–929.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Barber, B. M., and
    2. Odean, T.

    (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Bertrand, M.,
    2. Goldin, C., and
    3. Katz, L. F.

    (2010). Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 228–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Bertrand, M.,
    2. Kamenica, E., and
    3. Pan, J.

    (2015). Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 571–614.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Bittmann, S.

    (2015). Ressources économiques des femmes et travail domestique des conjoints : quels effets pour quelles tâches? Economie et Statistique, 305–338.
14. 1. Black, S. E., and
    2. Strahan, P. E.

    (2002). Entrepreneurship and bank credit availability. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2807–2833.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Blanchflower, D. G., and
    2. Oswald, A. J.

    (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 26–60.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Boden, R. J.

    (1999). Flexible working hours, family responsibilities, and female self-employment: Gender differences in self-employment selection. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(1), 71–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Budig, M. J.

    (2006). Intersections on the road to self-employment: Gender, family and occupational class. Social Forces, 84(4), 2223–2239.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Calonico, S.,
    2. Cattaneo, M. D., and
    3. Titiunik, R.

    (2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295–2326.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Card, D.,
    2. Johnston, A.,
    3. Leung, P.,
    4. Mas, A., and
    5. Pei, Z.

    (2015a). The effect of unemployment benefits on the duration of unemployment insurance receipt: New evidence from a regression kink design in missouri, 2003-2013. American Economic Review, 105(5), 126–30.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Card, D.,
    2. Lee, D. S.,
    3. Pei, Z., and
    4. Weber, A.

    (2015b). Inference on causal effects in a generalized regression kink design. Econometrica, 83(6), 2453–2483.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Card, D.,
    2. Lee, D. S.,
    3. Pei, Z., and
    4. Weber, A.

    (2017). Regression kink design: Theory and practice. In Regression discontinuity designs (Vol. 38, p. 341–382). Emerald Publishing Limited.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Cattaneo, M. D.,
    2. Jansson, M., and
    3. Ma, X.

    (2018). Manipulation testing based on density discontinuity. The Stata Journal, 18(1), 234–261.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Cattaneo, M. D.,
    2. Jansson, M., and
    3. Ma, X.

    (2020). Simple local polynomial density estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(531), 1449–1455.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Coile, C.,
    2. Duggan, M., and
    3. Guo, A.

    (2021). To work for yourself, for others, or not at all? how disability benefits affect the employment decisions of older veterans. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(3), 686–714.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Connelly, R.

    (1992). Self-employment and providing child care. Demography, 29(1), 17–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 1. Croson, R., and
    2. Gneezy, U.

    (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Cygan-Rehm, K.

    (2016). Parental leave benefit and differential fertility responses: evidence from a german reform. Journal of Population Economics, 29(1), 73–103.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Dahl, G. B.,
    2. Løken, K. V.,
    3. Mogstad, M., and
    4. Salvanes, K. V.

    (2016). What is the case for paid maternity leave? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(4), 655–670.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Dillon, E. W., and
    2. Stanton, C. T.

    (2017). Self-employment dynamics and the returns to entrepreneurship. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 23168.
30. 1. Ekberg, J.,
    2. Eriksson, R., and
    3. Friebel, G.

    (2013). Parental leave — a policy evaluation of the Swedish “daddy-month” reform. Journal of Public Economics, 97(C), 131–143.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. Eurofound. (2014). Working conditions and job quality: Comparing sectors in europe (Tech. Rep.).
32. European Commission, D. E. S. A. I. (2017). Policy brief on women’s entrepreneurship. OECD Publishing.
33. 1. Evans, D. S., and
    2. Jovanovic, B.

    (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 808–827.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Flèche, S.,
    2. Lepinteur, A., and
    3. Powdthavee, N.

    (2021). The importance of capital in closing the entrepreneurial gender gap: A longitudinal study of lottery wins. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 188, 591–607.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Francesconi, M.

    (2002). A joint dynamic model of fertility and work of married women. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(2), 336–380.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Gangl, M., and
    2. Ziefle, A.

    (2009). Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in britain, germany, and the united states. Demography, 46(2), 341–369.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 1. Ganong, P., and
    2. Jäger, S.

    (2018). A permutation test for the regression kink design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(522), 494–504.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Gelber, A.,
    2. Moore, T. J., and
    3. Strand, A.

    (2017). The effect of disability insurance payments on beneficiaries’ earnings. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 229–61.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Gelman, A., and
    2. Imbens, G.

    (2019). Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 37(3), 447–456.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Georgellis, Y., and
    2. Wall, H. J.

    (2005). Gender differences in self-employment. International Review of Applied Economics, 19(3), 321–342.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Gerards, R., and
    2. Theunissen, P.

    (2018). Becoming a mompreneur: Parental leave policies and mothers’ propensity for self-employment. Maastricht University, unpublished manuscript.
42. 1. Ginja, R.,
    2. Jans, J., and
    3. Karimi, A.

    (2020). Parental leave benefits, household labor supply, and children’s long-run outcomes. Journal of Labor Economics, 38(1), 261–320.

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Goldin, C.

    (2014). A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review, 104(4), 1091–1119.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
44. 1. Gottlieb, J. D.,
    2. Townsend, R. R., and
    3. Xu, T.

    (2021). Does career risk deter potential entrepreneurs? Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming.
45. 1. Guiso, L.,
    2. Sapienza, P., and
    3. Zingales, L.

    (2004). Does local financial development matter?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 929–969.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. 1. Haapanen, M., and
    2. Tervo, H.

    (2009). Self-employment duration in urban and rural locations. Applied economics, 41(19), 2449–2461.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Hamilton, B. H.

    (2000). Does entrepreneurship pay? an empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 604–631.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Heim, B. T., and
    2. Lurie, I. Z.

    (2010). The effect of self-employed health insurance subsidies on self-employment. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11), 995–1007.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Hombert, J.,
    2. Schoar, A.,
    3. Sraer, D., and
    4. Thesmar, D.

    (2020). Can unemployment insurance spur entrepreneurial activity? evidence from france. The Journal of Finance, 75(3), 1247–1285.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Hotchkiss, J. L.,
    2. Pitts, M. M., and
    3. Walker, M. B.

    (2017). Impact of first birth career interruption on earnings: evidence from administrative data. Applied Economics, 49(35), 3509–3522.

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Hsieh, C.-T.,
    2. Hurst, E.,
    3. Jones, C. I., and
    4. Klenow, P. J.

    (2019). The allocation of talent and u.s. economic growth. Econometrica, 87(5), 1439–1474.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
52. 1. Imbens, G., and
    2. Kalyanaraman, K.

    (2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(3), 933–959.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Imbens, G., and
    2. Lemieux, T.

    (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. INAMI. (2007). Statistiques des indemnités - 2007. https://www.riziv.fgov.be/fr/statistiques/indemnites/Pages/default.aspx.
55. ISSP. (2005). International social survey programme: Work orientations iii - issp 2005. GESIS Datenarchiv.
56. 1. Kaplan, D. M.

    (2022). sivqr: Smoothed iv quantile regression. Stata Journal, Forthcoming.
57. 1. Kirkwood, J.

    (2009). Motivational factors in a push-pull theory of entrepreneurship. Gender in Management, 24(5), 346–364.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
58. 1. Kleven, H.,
    2. Landais, C., and
    3. Søgaard, J. E.

    (2019). Children and gender inequality: Evidence from denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 181–209.

    OpenUrl
59. 1. Kluve, J., and
    2. Schmitz, S.

    (2018). Back to work: Parental benefits and mothers’ labor market outcomes in the medium run. ILR Review, 71(1), 143–173.

    OpenUrl
60. 1. Kärnä, A.,
    2. Manduchi, A., and
    3. Stephan, A.

    (2021). Distance still matters: Local bank closures and credit availability. International Review of Finance, 21(4), 1503–1510.

    OpenUrl
61. 1. Lalive, R.,
    2. Schlosser, A.,
    3. Steinhauer, A., and
    4. Zweimüller, J.

    (2014). Parental leave and mothers’ careers: The relative importance of job protection and cash benefits. The Review of Economic Studies, 81(1), 219–265.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
62. 1. Lalive, R., and
    2. Zweimüller, J.

    (2009). How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? evidence from two natural experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1363–1402.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
63. 1. Landais, C.

    (2015). Assessing the welfare effects of unemployment benefits using the regression kink design. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(4), 24378.
64. 1. Lee, D. S.

    (2009). Training, wages, and sample selection: Estimating sharp bounds on treatment effects. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(3), 1071–1102.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
65. 1. Lee, D. S., and
    2. Lemieux, T.

    (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. 1. Lim, K., and
    2. Michelmore, K.

    (2018). The eitc and self-employment among married mothers. Labour Economics, 55, 98–115.

    OpenUrl
67. 1. Lundborg, P.,
    2. Plug, E., and
    3. Rasmussen, A. W.

    (2017). Can women have children and a career? iv evidence from ivf treatments. American Economic Review, 107(6), 1611–37.

    OpenUrl
68. 1. Macpherson, D. A.

    (1988). Self-employment and married women. Economics Letters, 28(3), 281–284.

    OpenUrl
69. 1. Malkova, O.

    (2018). Can maternity benefits have long-term effects on childbearing? evidence from soviet russia. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(4), 691703.
70. 1. Markussen, S., and
    2. Røed, K.

    (2017). The gender gap in entrepreneurship – the role of peer effects. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 134, 356–373.

    OpenUrl
71. 1. McCrary, J.

    (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698–714.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
72. 1. Nguyen, H.-L. Q.

    (2019). Are credit markets still local? evidence from bank branch closings. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(1), 1–32.

    OpenUrl
73. 1. Niederle, M., and
    2. Vesterlund, L.

    (2007). Do women shy away from competition? do men compete too much?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
74. 1. Olivetti, C., and
    2. Petrongolo, B.

    (2017). The economic consequences of family policies: Lessons from a century of legislation in high-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 205–30.

    OpenUrl
75. 1. Pailhé, A., and
    2. Solaz, A.

    (2008). Time with children: Do fathers and mothers replace each other when one parent is unemployed? European Journal of Population, 24(2), 211–236.

    OpenUrl
76. 1. Parker, S. C.

    (2018). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge University Press.
77. 1. Raute, A.

    (2019). Can financial incentives reduce the baby gap? evidence from a reform in maternity leave benefits. Journal of Public Economics, 169, 203–222.

    OpenUrl
78. 1. Rocha, V., and
    2. van Praag, M.

    (2020). Mind the gap: The role of gender in entrepreneurial career choice and social influence by founders. Strategic Management Journal, 41(5), 841–866.

    OpenUrl
79. 1. Rosen, S.

    (1981). The economics of superstars. American Economic Review, 71(5), 845–858.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
80. 1. Rossin-Slater, M.

    (2017). Signing up new fathers: Do paternity establishment initiatives increase marriage, parental investment, and child well-being? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(2), 93–130.

    OpenUrl
81. 1. Rossin-Slater, M.

    (2018). Maternity and family leave policy. In S. L. Averett, L. M. Argys, and S. D. Hoffman (Eds.), The oxford handbook of women and the economy. Oxford University Press.
82. 1. Schönberg, U., and
    2. Ludsteck, J.

    (2014). Expansions in maternity leave coverage and mothers’ labor market outcomes after childbirth. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(3), 469–505.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
83. 1. Semykina, A.

    (2018). Self-employment among women: Do children matter more than we previously thought? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 33(3), 416–434.

    OpenUrl
84. 1. Stearns, J.

    (2018). The long-run effects of wage replacement and job protection: Evidence from two maternity leave reforms in great britain.
85. 1. Taylor, M. P.

    (1999). Survival of the fittest? an analysis of self-employment duration in britain. The Economic Journal, 109(454), 140–155.

    OpenUrl
86. 1. Wellington, A. J.

    (2006). Self-employment: the new solution for balancing family and career? Labour Economics, 13(3), 357–386.

    OpenUrl