Firm and Worker Responses to Extensions in Paid Maternity Leave

References

1. 1. Abowd, J. M.,
   2. F. Kramarz, and
   3. D. N. Margolis

   (1999). High Wage Workers and High Wage Firms. Econometrica 67 (2), 251–333.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Agénor, P.-R. and
   2. O. Canuto

   (2015). Gender Equality and Economic Growth in Brazil: A Long-Run Analysis. Journal of Macroeconomics 43, 155–172.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Ahmed, S. and
   2. D. Fielding

   (2019). Changes in Maternity Leave Coverage: Implications for Fertility, Labour Force Participation and Child Mortality. Social Science & Medicine 241, 112573.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Aizawa, N.,
   2. C. Mommaerts, and
   3. S. Rennane

   (2022). Explaining Heterogeneity in Use of Non-wage Benefits: The Role of Worker and Firm Characteristics in Disability Accommodations. AEA Papers and Proceedings 112, 376–380.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Akgunduz, Y. E. and
   2. J. Plantenga

   (2013). Labour Market Effects of Parental Leave in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Economics 37 (4), 845–862.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Albagli, P. and
   2. T. Rau

   (2019). The Effects of a Maternity Leave Reform on Children’s Abilities and Maternal Outcomes in Chile. The Economic Journal 129 (619), 1015–1047.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Arrow, K. J.

   (1993). Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. American Economic Review , 941–973.
8. 1. Aslim, E. G.,
   2. I. Panovska, and
   3. M. A. Taş

   (2021). Macroeconomic Effects of Maternity Leave Legislation in Emerging Economies. Economic Modelling 100, 105497.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Autor, D.,
   2. M. Duggan, and
   3. J. Gruber

   (2014). Moral Hazard and Claims Deterrence in Private Disability Insurance. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6 (4), 110–141.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Bailey, M. J.,
    2. T. S. Byker,
    3. E. Patel, and
    4. S. Ramnath

    (2019). The Long-Term Effects of California’s 2004 Paid Family Leave Act on Women’s Careers: Evidence from US Tax Data. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
11. 1. Baker, M. and
    2. K. Milligan

    (2008). How Does Job-Protected Maternity Leave Affect Mothers’ Employment? Journal of Labor Economics 26 (4), 655–691.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Banerjee, A.,
    2. R. Hanna,
    3. B. Olken, and
    4. D. Sverdlin-Lisker

    (2023). Social Protection in the Developing World. Working Paper .
13. 1. Bartel, A.,
    2. M. Rossin-Slater,
    3. C. Ruhm,
    4. M. Slopen, and
    5. J. Waldfogel

    (2023). The Impacts of Paid Family and Medical Leave on Worker Health, Family Well-Being, and Employer Outcomes. Annual Review of Public Health 44, 429–443.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Bound, J.,
    2. J. B. Cullen,
    3. A. Nichols, and
    4. L. Schmidt

    (2004). The Welfare Implications of Increasing Disability Insurance Benefit Generosity. Journal of Public Economics 88 (12), 2487–2514.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Canaan, S.,
    2. A. Lassen,
    3. P. Rosenbaum, and
    4. H. Steingrimsdottir

    (2022). Maternity Leave and Paternity Leave: Evidence on the Economic Impact of Legislative Changes in High Income Countries.
16. 1. Carneiro, P.,
    2. K. V. Løken, and
    3. K. G. Salvanes

    (2015). A Flying Start? Maternity Leave Benefits and Long-Run Outcomes of Children. Journal of Political Economy 123 (2), 365–412.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Carvalho, S. S. d.,
    2. S. P. Firpo, and
    3. G. Gonzaga

    (2006). Os Efeitos do Aumento da Licença-Maternidade sobre o Salário e o Emprego da Mulher no Brasil. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea).
18. Central Bank of Brazil (2023). Calculadora do Cidadão. Central Bank of Brazil, Accessed on https://www3.bcb.gov.br/CALCIDADAO/publico/corrigirPorIndice.do?method=corrigirPorIndice in September 2023.
19. 1. Chen, J. and
    2. J. Roth

    (Forthcoming). Logs with Zeros? Some Problems and Solutions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
20. 1. Chetty, R.

    (2008). Moral Hazard Versus Liquidity and Optimal Unemployment Insurance. Journal of Political Economy 116 (2), 173–234.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Corradini, V.,
    2. L. Lagos, and
    3. G. Sharma

    (2022). Collective Bargaining for Women: How Unions Can Create Female-Friendly Jobs.
22. 1. Dahl, G. B.,
    2. K. V. Løken, and
    3. M. Mogstad

    (2014). Peer Effects in Program Participation. American Economic Review 104 (7), 2049–2074.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Dahl, G. B.,
    2. K. V. Løken,
    3. M. Mogstad, and
    4. K. V. Salvanes

    (2016). What Is the Case for Paid Maternity Leave? Review of Economics and Statistics 98 (4), 655–670.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. de Medeiros, M. O.

    (2022). Motherhood Penalty in Labor Market: Evidence from Brazil. Ph. D. thesis, PUC-Rio.
25. 1. Delechat, C. C. and
    2. L. Medina

    (2020). Back to Basics: What Is the Informal Economy? Finance & Development 57 (004).
26. 1. Diamond, P. and
    2. E. Sheshinski

    (1995). Economic Aspects of Optimal Disability Benefits. Journal of Public Economics 57 (1), 1–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Einav, L.,
    2. A. Finkelstein,
    3. S. P. Ryan,
    4. P. Schrimpf, and
    5. M. R. Cullen

    (2013). Selection on Moral Hazard in Health Insurance. American Economic Review 103 (1), 178–219.

    OpenUrlPubMed
28. 1. Fallon, K. M.,
    2. A. Mazar, and
    3. L. Swiss

    (2017). The Development Benefits of Maternity Leave. World Development 96, 102–118.

    OpenUrl
29. Family Talks and 4Daddy (2022). Relatório: Pesquisa Licenc-cas Maternidade e Paternidade nas Empresas. pp. Accessed on https://familytalks.org/pdf/ebooks/relatorio_pesquisa_parentalidade_nas_empresas.pdf.
30. 1. Gallen, Y.

    (2019). The Effect of Parental Leave Extensions on Firms and Coworkers. Technical report, Working Paper.
31. 1. Gerard, F. and
    2. G. Gonzaga

    (2021). Informal Labor and the Efficiency Cost of Social Programs: Evidence from Unemployment Insurance in Brazil. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 13 (3), 167–206.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Ginja, R.,
    2. A. Karimi, and
    3. P. Xiao

    (2023). Employer responses to family leave programs. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 15 (1), 107–135.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Goldin, C.,
    2. S. P. Kerr, and
    3. C. Olivetti

    (2020). Why Firms Offer Paid Parental Leave: An Exploratory Study. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
34. 1. Gonzaga, G. and
    2. T. Guanziroli

    (2019). Returns to Experience Across Tasks: Evidence from Brazil. Applied Economics Letters 26 (20), 1718–1723.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Gonzaga, G.,
    2. W. F. Maloney, and
    3. A. Mizala

    (2003). Labor Turnover and Labor Legislation in Brazil. Economia 4 (1), 165–222.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Gruber, J.

    (1994). The Incidence of Mandated Maternity Benefits. American Economic Review , 622–641.
37. 1. Han, W.-J.,
    2. C. Ruhm, and
    3. J. Waldfogel

    (2009). Parental Leave Policies and Parents’ Employment and Leave-Taking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 28 (1), 29–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
38. 1. Heath, R. and
    2. S. Jayachandran

    (2018). The Causes and Consequences of Increased Female Education and Labor Force Participation in Developing Countries. In The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy. Oxford University Press.
39. 1. Hotz, V. J.,
    2. P. Johansson, and
    3. A. Karimi

    (2018). Parenthood, Family Friendly Workplaces, and the Gender Gaps in Early Work Careers. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
40. 1. Imbens, G. W. and
    2. J. D. Angrist

    (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica 62 (2), 467–475.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Jacobson, L. S.,
    2. R. J. LaLonde, and
    3. D. G. Sullivan

    (1993). Earnings Losses of Displaced Workers. American Economic Review , 685–709.
42. 1. Johansson, P. and
    2. M. Palme

    (2005). Moral Hazard and Sickness Insurance. Journal of Public Economics 89 (9-10), 1879–1890.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
43. 1. Kleven, H.,
    2. C. Landais, and
    3. G. L. Mariante

    (2023). The Child Penalty Atlas. Working Paper .
44. 1. Kleven, H.,
    2. C. Landais, and
    3. J. E. Søgaard

    (2019). Children and Gender Inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 11 (4), 181–209.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. 1. Kluve, J. and
    2. M. Tamm

    (2013). Parental Leave Regulations, Mothers’ Labor Force Attachment and Fathers’ Childcare Involvement: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Journal of Population Economics 26, 983–1005.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. 1. Kolsrud, J.,
    2. C. Landais,
    3. P. Nilsson, and
    4. J. Spinnewijn

    (2018). The Optimal Timing of Unemployment Benefits: Theory and Evidence from Sweden. American Economic Review 108 (4-5), 985–1033.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Lalive, R. and
    2. J. Zweimüller

    (2009). How Does Parental Leave Affect Fertility and Return to Work? Evidence from Two Natural Experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (3), 1363–1402.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Lazear, E. P.

    (2009). Firm-Specific Human Capital: A Skill-Weights Approach. Journal of Political Economy 117 (5), 914–940.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Liu, T.,
    2. C. A. Makridis,
    3. P. Ouimet, and
    4. E. Simintzi

    (2023). The Distribution of Nonwage Benefits: Maternity Benefits and Gender Diversity. The Review of Financial Studies 36 (1), 194–234.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Miller, D. L.,
    2. N. Shenhav, and
    3. M. Grosz

    (2023). Selection into Identification in Fixed Effects Models, with Application to Head Start. Journal of Human Resources 58 (5), 1523–1566.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
51. OECD (2018). Age of Mothers at Childbirth and Age-Specific Fertility. OECD Family Database.
52. 1. Olivetti, C. and
    2. B. Petrongolo

    (2017). The Economic Consequences of Family Policies: Lessons from a Century of Legislation in High-Income Countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (1), 205–230.

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Rabello, G. G. and
    2. J. M. d. Oliveira

    (2015). Tributação sobre Empresas no Brasil: Comparação Internacional.
54. 1. Rasmussen, A. W.

    (2010). Increasing the Length of Parents’ Birth-Related Leave: The Effect on Children’s Long-Term Educational Outcomes. Labour Economics 17(1), 91–100.

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Rossin-Slater, M.

    (2017). Maternity and Family Leave Policy. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
56. 1. Rossin-Slater, M.,
    2. C. J. Ruhm, and
    3. J. Waldfogel

    (2013). The Effects of California’s Paid Family Leave Program on Mothers’ Leave-Taking and Subsequent Labor Market Outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 32 (2), 224–245.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
57. 1. Ruhm, C. J.

    (1998). The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons from Europe. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (1), 285–317.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
58. 1. Schönberg, U. and
    2. J. Ludsteck

    (2014). Expansions in Maternity Leave Coverage and Mothers’ Labor Market Outcomes After Childbirth. Journal of Labor Economics 32 (3), 469–505.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
59. 1. Sorkin, I.

    (2018). Ranking Firms Using Revealed Preference. The Quarterly Journal of Eco-nomics 133 (3), 1331–1393.

    OpenUrl
60. 1. Spitz-Oener, A.

    (2006). Technical Change, Job Tasks, and Rising Educational Demands: Looking Outside the Wage Structure. Journal of Labor Economics 24 (2), 235–270.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. 1. Stearns, J.

    (2018). The Long-Run Effects of Wage Replacement and Job Protection: Evidence from Two Maternity Leave Reforms in Great Britain. Available at SSRN 3030808.
62. 1. Stolar, L. B.

    (2018). A Hora de Voltar: Consequências da Ampliação da Licença-Maternidade para Emprego e Renda. Working Paper.
63. 1. Szerman, C.

    (2023). The Employee Costs of Corporate Debarment in Public Procurement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 15 (1), 411–41.

    OpenUrl
64. 1. Tate, G. and
    2. L. Yang

    (2015). Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure. Journal of Financial Economics 117 (1), 77–97.

    OpenUrl
65. 1. Timpe, B.

    (2022). The Labor Market Impacts of America’s First Paid Maternity Leave Policy.
66. 1. Ulyssea, G.

    (2018). Firms, informality, and development: Theory and Evidence from Brazil. American Economic Review 108 (8), 2015–2047.

    OpenUrl
67. 1. Uribe, A. M. T.,
    2. C. O. Vargas, and
    3. N. R. Bustamante

    (2019). Unintended Consequences of Maternity Leave Legislation: The Case of Colombia. World Development 122, 218–232.

    OpenUrl
68. 1. Van Doornik, B.,
    2. D. Schoenherr, and
    3. J. Skrastins

    (2023). Strategic Formal Layoffs: Unemployment Insurance and Informal Labor Markets. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 15 (1), 292–318.

    OpenUrl
69. 1. Vu, K. and
    2. P. Glewwe

    (2022). Maternity Benefits Mandate and Women’s Choice of Work in Vietnam. World Development 158.
70. 1. Woodbury, S. A.

    (1983). Substitution Between Wage and Nonwage Benefits. American Economic Review 73 (1), 166–182.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
71. WORLD Policy Analysis Center (2023). Infant Caregiving Public Use Data.