Reconsidering Peer Effects from Schoolmates Exposed to Violence at Home

References

1. 1. Abdulkadiroğlu, A.,
   2. J. Angrist, and
   3. P. Pathak

   (2014). The elite illusion: Achievement effects at Boston and New York exam schools. Econometrica 82(1), 137–196.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. 1. Abdulkadiroğlu, A.,
   2. J. D. Angrist,
   3. P. D. Hull, and
   4. P. A. Pathak

   (2016). Charters without lotteries: Testing takeovers in New Orleans and Boston. The American Economic Review 106(7), 1878–1920.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Angrist, J. D.

   (2014). The perils of peer effects. Labour Economics 30, 98–108.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Angrist, J. D. and
   2. K. Lang

   (2004). Does school integration generate peer effects? evidence from Boston’s Metco program. The American Economic Review 94(5), 1613–1634.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Angrist, J. D.,
   2. P. A. Pathak, and
   3. C. R. Walters

   (2013). Explaining charter school effectiveness. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5(4), 1–27.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 1. Angrist, J. D.,
   2. P. A. Pathak, and
   3. R. A. Zarate

   (2023). Choice and consequence: Assessing mismatch at chicago exam schools. Journal of Public Economics 223(2).
7. 1. Bettinger, E. P.,
   2. T. B. Long,
   3. P. Oreopoulos, and
   4. L. Sanbonmatsu

   (2012). The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the hr block fafsa experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(3), 1205–1242.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Carrell, S. E. and
   2. M. Hoekstra

   (2010). Externalities in the classroom: How children exposed to domestic violence affect everyone’s kids. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(1), 211–228.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Carrell, S. E. and
   2. M. Hoekstra

   (2012). Family business or social problem? the cost of unreported domestic violence. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 31(4), 861–875.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Carrell, S. E.,
    2. M. Hoekstra, and
    3. E. Kuka

    (2018). The long-run effects of disruptive peers. Technical Report 11.
11. 1. Castleman, B. L. and
    2. L. C. Page

    (2016). Freshman year financial aid nudges: An experiment to increase fafsa renewal and sophomore year persistence. The Journal of Human Resources 51(2), 389–415.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 1. Chetty, R.,
    2. J. N. Friedman,
    3. N. Hilger,
    4. E. Saez,
    5. D. W. Schanzenbach, and
    6. D. Yagan

    (2011). How does your kindergarten classroom affect your earnings? evidence from Project STAR. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4), 1593–1660.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 1. Clotfelter, C. T.,
    2. H. F. Ladd, and
    3. J. L. Vigdor

    (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources 41(4), 778–820.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 1. Danese, A. and
    2. B. S. McEwen

    (2012). Adverse childhood experiences, allostasis, allostatic load, and age-related disease. Physiology & behavior 106(1), 29–39.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 1. Dobbie, W. and
    2. R. G. Fryer

    (2013). Getting beneath the veil of effective schools: Evidence from New York City. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5(4), 28–60.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Dobbie, W. and
    2. R. G. Fryer Jr.

    (2014). The impact of attending a school with high-achieving peers: Evidence from the New York City exam schools. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6(3), 58–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Duflo, E.,
    2. P. Dupas, and
    3. M. Kremera

    (2011). Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. The American Economic Review 101(5), 1739–1774.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 1. Figlio, D. N.

    (2007). Boys named Sue: Disruptive children and their peers. Education Finance and Policy 2(4), 376–394.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Finkelhor, D.,
    2. H. Turner,
    3. R. Ormrod, and
    4. S. L. Hamby

    (2009). Violence, abuse, and crime exposure in a national sample of children and youth. Pediatrics 124(5), 1411–1423.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 1. Hinnant, J. B.,
    2. M. El-Sheikh,
    3. M. Keiley, and
    4. J. A. Buckhalt

    (2013). Marital conflict, allostatic load, and the development of children’s fluid cognitive performance. Child development 84(6), 2003–2014.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 1. Hoxby, C.

    (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
22. 1. Hoxby, C. M. and
    2. G. Weingarth

    (2005). Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects. Technical report, Working paper.
23. 1. Imberman, S. A.,
    2. A. D. Kugler, and
    3. B. I. Sacerdote

    (2012). Katrina’s children: Evidence on the structure of peer effects from hurricane evacuees. The American Economic Review 102(5), 2048–2082.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. 1. Lavy, V. and
    2. A. Schlosser

    (2011). Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3(2), 1–33.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. 1. Manski, C. F.

    (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies 60(3), 531–542.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Oreopoulos, P. and
    2. U. Petronijevic

    (2019, July). The remarkable unresponsiveness of college students to nudging and what we can learn from it. Working Paper 26059, National Bureau of Economic Research.
27. 1. Page, L. C.,
    2. B. L. Castleman, and
    3. K. Meyer

    (2020). Customized nudging to improve fafsa completion and income verification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 42(1), 3–21.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Reber, S.,
    2. D. Rünger, and
    3. M. Wong

    (2023). The effects of charter high schools on academic achievement and college enrollment: Evidence from los angeles. Education Finance and Policy 19(4), 1–39.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Rogosch, F. A.,
    2. M. N. Dackis, and
    3. D. Cicchetti

    (2011). Child maltreatment and allostatic load: Consequences for physical and mental health in children from low-income families. Development and psychopathology 23(4), 1107–1124.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
30. 1. Sharkey, P.

    (2010). The acute effect of local homicides on children’s cognitive performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(26), 11733–11738.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. 1. Sharkey, P.,
    2. A. E. Schwartz,
    3. I. G. Ellen, and
    4. J. Lacoe

    (2014). High stakes in the classroom, high stakes on the street: The effects of community violence on students’ standardized test performance. Sociological Science 1, 199–220.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. 1. Sharkey, P. T.,
    2. N. Tirado-Strayer,
    3. A. V. Papachristos, and
    4. C. C. Raver

    (2012). The effect of local violence on children’s attention and impulse control. American journal of public health 102(12), 2287–2293.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 1. West, M. R. and
    2. P. E. Peterson

    (2006). The efficacy of choice threats within school accountability systems: Results from legislatively induced experiments. The Economic Journal 116(510), C46–C62.

    OpenUrl