Balance, Attrition, and Compliance
| Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | Cohort 3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | C | p-Value | T | C | p-Value | T | C | p-Value | |
| Panel A: Pre-Treatment Characteristics | |||||||||
| Avg. student | |||||||||
| Age | 8.82 | 8.83 | 0.71 | 8.49 | 8.37 | 0.09 | 8.40 | 8.47 | 0.31 |
| Proportion female | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.76 |
| Scores | |||||||||
| Fluency of oral reading | 49.84 | 50.73 | 0.14 | 42.17 | 42.12 | 0.98 | 44.17 | 43.42 | 0.51 |
| Knowledge of letter sounds | 14.82 | 13.64 | 0.20 | 12.41 | 13.46 | 0.18 | 19.51 | 19.00 | 0.69 |
| Reading of nonwords | 28.83 | 28.33 | 0.54 | 24.22 | 24.88 | 0.41 | 26.62 | 26.83 | 0.84 |
| Reading comprehension | 3.07 | 3.10 | 0.55 | 2.10 | 1.99 | 0.20 | 5.33 | 5.05 | 0.26 |
| Literacy score (avg. of subscores) | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.90 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.55 |
| Addition | 12.18 | 12.23 | 0.60 | 10.15 | 9.97 | 0.57 | 11.78 | 11.89 | 0.67 |
| Subtraction | 9.51 | 9.21 | 0.40 | 8.12 | 7.74 | 0.26 | 9.44 | 9.16 | 0.35 |
| Math score (avg. of subscores) | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.95 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.87 |
| Avg. school | |||||||||
| Grade 3 enrollment | 47.71 | 47.70 | 0.83 | 41.33 | 42.88 | 0.76 | 45.83 | 43.45 | 0.54 |
| Morning | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.50 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.49 |
| Rural | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.53 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.57 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.74 |
| Avg. socioeconomic status (1–6) | 1.89 | 1.81 | 0.44 | 1.81 | 1.91 | 0.26 | 1.89 | 1.82 | 0.51 |
| Avg. class size | 23.91 | 23.34 | 0.56 | 23.42 | 26.06 | 0.09 | 24.65 | 23.49 | 0.48 |
| Avg. number of classrooms in Grade 3 | 1.56 | 1.61 | 0.84 | 1.45 | 1.36 | 0.43 | 1.55 | 1.50 | 0.69 |
| Panel B: Tutorial Assignment | |||||||||
| Avg. tutorial size | 5.92 | 5.91 | 0.63 | 4.82 | 4.79 | 0.67 | 4.99 | 4.91 | 0.30 |
| SD literacy score of students in tutorial | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.32 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.71 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.79 |
| Panel C: Compliance | |||||||||
| Ever attended a tutorial | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Tutorial attendance (percent) | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Tutorial attendance (sessions) | 26.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 43.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 42.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Panel D: Attrition | |||||||||
| End of Grade 3 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.95 |
| Beg./mid. Grade 4 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.40 |
| End Grade 4 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.20 |
Notes: Panel A shows the average pre-treatment characteristics of eligible students. Scores for subtasks are expressed in number of correct responses (fluency of oral reading, reading of nonwords, reading comprehension, additions, subtractions). Literacy and math scores are expressed as average proportion of correct answers in each subtask. Panel B shows tutorials’ characteristics. In the case of the control group, we assigned students to hypothetical tutorials (even when no tutor was assigned to them). Panel C shows which eligible students attended the tutorials and the intensity of attendance. Panel D shows the attrition rates at different time horizons of the eligible students observed at baseline. Columns labeled “T” show the average for students in schools randomized to treatment. Columns labeled “C” show the average for students in schools randomized to control. Columns labeled “p-Value” show the p-value of a test of H0 : θ = 0 (see Equation 1). We present these statistics by cohort.