Table 1

Balance, Attrition, and Compliance

Cohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
TCp-ValueTCp-ValueTCp-Value
Panel A: Pre-Treatment Characteristics
Avg. student
 Age8.828.830.718.498.370.098.408.470.31
 Proportion female0.500.480.740.470.500.420.500.520.76
 Scores
  Fluency of oral reading49.8450.730.1442.1742.120.9844.1743.420.51
  Knowledge of letter sounds14.8213.640.2012.4113.460.1819.5119.000.69
  Reading of nonwords28.8328.330.5424.2224.880.4126.6226.830.84
  Reading comprehension3.073.100.552.101.990.205.335.050.26
  Literacy score (avg. of subscores)0.590.590.900.390.390.370.490.480.55
  Addition12.1812.230.6010.159.970.5711.7811.890.67
  Subtraction9.519.210.408.127.740.269.449.160.35
  Math score (avg. of subscores)0.420.420.950.350.340.310.410.410.87
Avg. school
 Grade 3 enrollment47.7147.700.8341.3342.880.7645.8343.450.54
 Morning0.790.720.500.740.760.800.770.700.49
 Rural0.250.200.530.120.170.570.150.170.74
 Avg. socioeconomic status (1–6)1.891.810.441.811.910.261.891.820.51
 Avg. class size23.9123.340.5623.4226.060.0924.6523.490.48
 Avg. number of classrooms in Grade 31.561.610.841.451.360.431.551.500.69
Panel B: Tutorial Assignment
Avg. tutorial size5.925.910.634.824.790.674.994.910.30
SD literacy score of students in tutorial0.090.100.320.100.100.710.100.100.79
Panel C: Compliance
Ever attended a tutorial0.920.000.000.940.000.000.980.000.00
Tutorial attendance (percent)0.730.000.000.900.000.000.900.000.00
Tutorial attendance (sessions)26.200.000.0043.030.000.0042.990.000.00
Panel D: Attrition
End of Grade 30.060.070.190.070.090.270.090.090.95
Beg./mid. Grade 40.540.600.250.120.160.080.100.120.40
End Grade 40.210.170.090.140.120.500.140.180.20

Notes: Panel A shows the average pre-treatment characteristics of eligible students. Scores for subtasks are expressed in number of correct responses (fluency of oral reading, reading of nonwords, reading comprehension, additions, subtractions). Literacy and math scores are expressed as average proportion of correct answers in each subtask. Panel B shows tutorials’ characteristics. In the case of the control group, we assigned students to hypothetical tutorials (even when no tutor was assigned to them). Panel C shows which eligible students attended the tutorials and the intensity of attendance. Panel D shows the attrition rates at different time horizons of the eligible students observed at baseline. Columns labeled “T” show the average for students in schools randomized to treatment. Columns labeled “C” show the average for students in schools randomized to control. Columns labeled “p-Value” show the p-value of a test of H0 : θ = 0 (see Equation 1). We present these statistics by cohort.