Reweighting Black–White Family Background Gaps and Outcome Gaps in the NLSY-79
Baseline | Reweighted | Change after Reweighting | Change after Reweighting × 0.25 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
Panel A: Family Background | ||||
Maternal years of education | −1.34*** | −0.10 | ||
(0.13) | (0.15) | |||
Maternal education ≤8 years | 0.10*** | 0.01 | ||
(0.02) | (0.03) | |||
Birth order | 1.08*** | 0.12 | ||
(0.10) | (0.18) | |||
Birth order ≥4 | 0.22*** | 0.02 | ||
(0.02) | (0.03) | |||
Farm residence | −0.02** | 0.00 | ||
(0.01) | (0.01) | |||
Panel B: Later-Life Outcomes | ||||
Highest grade completed | −0.82*** | −0.09 | −0.74 | −0.184 |
(0.12) | (0.14) | |||
Log earnings | −0.50*** | −0.28*** | −0.22 | −0.055 |
(0.06) | (0.08) | |||
AFQT score | −1.13*** | −0.87*** | −0.27 | −0.067 |
(0.04) | (0.06) |
Notes: Each entry in Columns 1 and 2 comes from a separate bivariate regression of the listed characteristic listed onto a Black indicator. Column 1 applies only sampling weights, while Column 2 additionally applies weights constructed using the procedure recommended by DiNardo, Fortin, and Lemieux (1996) and described in Section III.B of the text. Column 3 calculates the differences between the baseline and reweighted gaps for the outcome variables, while Column 4 multiplies these differences by 0.25, which was the approximate percent change in family background due to selective fertility decline reported in Table 2. For the regressions in Columns 1 and 2 robust standard errors are reported in parentheses. Significance: *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.