Table 2

Impacts of the Reform on School Exam Performance

MarksPass RateNumber Passed
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
0–10th percentile in previous year4.406***6.147***0.058***0.079***1.828*2.180***
(1.004)(0.849)(0.012)(0.011)(1.026)(0.754)
10–20th percentile in previous year2.049***2.382***0.024***0.030***0.9300.852**
(0.563)(0.578)(0.006)(0.007)(0.845)(0.379)
Diff-diffYesYesYesYesYesYes
School fixed effectsNoYesNoYesNoYes
Control lagged exam scoreYesYesYesYesYesYes
Control mean, post BRN109.46109.460.580.5830.8230.82
Observations77,73177,43177,73177,43177,73177,431
R20.6550.8010.6070.7630.4250.912
  • Notes: Each column represents a separate regression. All specifications include district-by-year fixed effects, flexible controls for lagged test scores, and indicators for prereform associations between district-rank deciles and subsequent outcomes. Reported coefficients correspond to the differential effect of being ranked in the associated decile of within-district performance in the post- (vs. pre-) reform period, compared to the middle six deciles. In even columns, the specification is augmented with school fixed effects. In Columns 1 and 2 the outcome is the average PSLE score (ranging from 0–250), in Columns 3 and 4 it is the pass rate, and in Columns 5 and 6 it is the number of pupils who passed. 300 singleton schools are dropped when results are estimated using school fixed effects. Standard errors are clustered at the district level.