Table 2

Differences in Application Choices and Admission Outcomes

Panel A: Application PortfoliosAverage SSCE Performance of Selected Schools
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Student’s BECE0.231***0.231***0.231***0.230***0.230***
(0.002)(0.002)(0.002)(0.002)(0.002)
JHS mean BECE0.203***0.163***0.145***0.084***0.048***
(0.006)(0.007)(0.006)(0.006)(0.007)
JHS public−0.180***−0.167***−0.147***−0.144***
(0.010)(0.010)(0.009)(0.008)
Elite SHS in district0.093***
(0.012)
Colonial SHS in district0.015
(0.012)
Category A SHS in district0.043***
(0.010)
JHS applicants to elite SHSs0.002***
(0.000)
District FEsNoNoNoYesYes
R20.3750.3900.4010.4700.482
N487,562487,562487,562487,562487,562
Panel B: Application and AdmissionApplication PortfolioAdmission Outcomes
Avg. SSCE PerformanceAverage SelectivitySSCE Perf. of SHSSelectivity of SHSPeer Quality in SHS
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Student’s BECE0.230***0.205***0.614***0.615***0.633***
(0.002)(0.001)(0.007)(0.004)(0.003)
JHS mean BECE0.084***0.085***0.141***0.107***0.111***
(0.006)(0.005)(0.008)(0.004)(0.004)
JHS public−0.147***−0.148***−0.033***−0.041***−0.045***
(0.009)(0.007)(0.009)(0.005)(0.005)
District FEsYesYesYesYesYes
R20.4700.5800.5630.7020.749
N487,562487,562472,542487,562487,562
  • Notes: Table reports coefficients from a set of linear regressions. Outcome of interest is indicated at the top of each column. SSCE performance measures the percentage of secondary school students who earned a credit in the 12th grade English and math exams. School selectivity measures the average ninth grade exam score of students admitted to a secondary school between 2005 and 2009. Peer quality measures the average ninth grade exam score of students admitted in the current year. Standard errors are clustered at the junior high school level and reported in parentheses; *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.