Table 8 2007 ENEM Regressions by 2007 Scores

	Half Optimal BW =5.6	Optimal BW= 11.2	Twice Optimal BW =22.4
Private · treatment	−0.027	−0.005	−0.023
	(0.190)	(0.139)	(0.125)
Private · below median · treatment	0.359^*	0.389^***	0.365^**
	(0.188)	(0.145)	(0.142)
Observations	6,963	14,201	26,077
R-squared	0.402	0.410	0.424

↵Notes: Source is ENEM microdata. *p<0.1,**p<0.05, ***p<0.01. We report the results of our benchmark specification (Equation 1) adding the terms below_median_sm, below_median_sm ⋅ priv_s, and below_median_sm ⋅ priv_s ⋅ d_s with triangular kernels and optimal bandwidth as suggested by Calonico et al. (2016). Covariates: gender, age, race, parental schooling, family income, teacher schooling, presence of a science lab, and ratios of teachers, computers, and staff to students. Metropolitan area fixed effects in all columns. Standard errors are clustered at the school level.