Labor Supply Elasticity to the Firm by Task Intensities (TI)
| RTI | NRMTI | NRCTI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Separation rate to employment | |||
| log wage (ϵe sw mean TI) | -1.273*** | -1.199*** | -1.241*** |
| (0.009) | (0.009) | (0.009) | |
| log wage × TI | -0.315*** | -0.181*** | 0.359*** |
| (0.007) | (0.007) | (0.007) | |
| ϵe sw (high TI) | -1.588 | -1.380 | -0.882 |
| ϵe sw (low TI) | -0.958 | -1.018 | -1.600 |
| Observations | 2,998,063 | 2,998,063 | 2,998,063 |
| Separation rate to nonemployment | |||
| log wage (ϵn sw mean TI) | -1.612*** | -1.570*** | -1.582*** |
| (0.006) | (0.006) | (0.006) | |
| log wage × TI | -0.227*** | -0.075*** | 0.222*** |
| (0.005) | (0.005) | (0.005) | |
| ϵn Sw (high TI) | -1.839 | -1.645 | -1.360 |
| ϵn sw (low TI) | -1.385 | -1.495 | -1.804 |
| Observations | 5,460,312 | 5,460,312 | 5,460,312 |
| Hiring probability from employment | |||
log wage ![]() | 1.725*** | 1.724*** | 1.717*** |
| (0.010) | (0.010) | (0.010) | |
| log wage × TI | -0.114*** | -0.098*** | 0.160*** |
| (0.008) | (0.008) | (0.009) | |
| ϵθw (high TI) | 1.052 | 1.085 | 1.045 |
| ϵθw (mean TI) | 1.066 | 1.069 | 1.082 |
| ϵθw (low TI) | 1.059 | 1.028 | 1.104 |
| Observations | 979,514 | 979,514 | 979,514 |
| Share of hires from employment (θ) | |||
| with high TI | 0.347 | 0.333 | 0.443 |
| with mean TI | 0.382 | 0.380 | 0.370 |
| with low TI | 0.424 | 0.436 | 0.291 |
| Firm-level labor supply elasticity (ϵLw) | |||
| with high TI | 2.288 | 1.852 | 0.985 |
| with mean TI | 1.689 | 1.559 | 1.615 |
| with low TI | 1.103 | 1.277 | 2.241 |
Source: SIAB and BHP 1985–2014. Authors’ calculations.
Notes: Clustered standard errors at the person level in parentheses. Routine task intensity (RTI), nonroutine manual task intensity (NRMTI), and nonroutine cognitive task intensity (NRCTI) are standardized with mean zero and standard deviation one. Thus, for instance, workers with low RTI are workers with RTI one standard deviation below the mean, and workers with high RTI are workers with RTI one standard deviation above the mean. Same control variables as in Table 2. Significance:
* p < 0.10,
** p < 0.05,
↵*** p < 0.01.