Table A.1

Labor Supply Elasticity to the Firm by Task Intensities (TI)—Exponential Model

RTINRMTINRCTI
Separation rate to employment
 log wage (ϵe sw mean TI)-1.454***-1.376***-1.420***
(0.011)(0.011)(0.011)
 log wage × TI-0.333***-0.195***0.383***
(0.009)(0.009)(0.009)
 ϵe sw (high TI)-1.787-1.571-1.037
 ϵe sw (low TI)-1.121-1.181-1.803
Observations2,998,0632,998,0632,998,063
Separation rate to nonemployment
 log wage (ϵn sw mean TI)-1.849***-1.802***-1.816***
(0.008)(0.008)(0.008)
 log wage × TI-0.255***-0.106***0.266***
(0.007)(0.007)(0.007)
 ϵn sw (high TI)-2.104-1.908-1.550
 ϵn sw (high TI)-1.594-1.696-2.082
Observations5,460,3125,460,3125,460,312
Hiring probability from employment
 log wage Embedded Image1.725***1.724***1.717***
(0.010)(0.010)(0.010)
 log wage × TI-0.114***-0.098***0.160***
(0.008)(0.008)(0.009)
 ϵθw (high TI)1.0521.0851.045
 ϵθw (mean TI)1.0661.0691.082
 ϵθw (low TI)1.0591.0281.104
Observations979,514979,514979,514
Share of hires from employment (θ)
 with high TI0.3470.3330.443
 with mean TI0.3820.3800.370
 with low TI0.4240.4360.291
Firm-level labor supply elasticity (ϵLw)
 with high TI2.7292.2821.314
 with mean TI2.0861.9472.008
 with low TI1.4551.6252.700
  • Source: SIAB and BHP 1985–2014. Authors’ calculations.

  • Notes: Clustered standard errors at the person level in parentheses. Routine task intensity (RTI), nonroutine manual task intensity (NRMTI), and nonroutine cognitive task intensity (NRCTI) are standardized with mean zero and standard deviation one. Thus, for instance, workers with low RTI are workers with RTI one standard deviation below the mean, and workers with high RTI are workers with RTI one standard deviation above the mean. Same control variables as in Table 2. Significance:

  • * p < 0.10,

  • ** p < 0.05,

  • *** p < 0.01.