Table 7

Dhanlakshmi Effects on Son Preference, DLHS 2007/08 and 2012/13

PunjabPunjabNoneNo ChangesNorthwest
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Panel A: Overall Son Preference
DL × Post−0.0329−0.0539−0.0138−0.04020.0206
(0.0903)(0.0036)(0.0589)(0.0008)(0.2182)
District FEXXXX
ControlsXXXX
Observations3,0203,02024,40414,9457,099
R20.0003990.4360.3220.3360.402
Panel B: Son Preference by Gender of Older Sibling
DL × Post × hasdaughter0.03540.0195−0.0171−0.01920.0510
(0.2360)(0.5586)(0.3590)(0.3133)(0.0461)
DL × Post−0.0554−0.05920.0003−0.0244−0.0056
(0.0044)(0.0072)(0.9709)(0.0030)(0.6757)
hasdaughter0.72170.89440.77310.82850.8636
(0.0000)(0.0000)(0.0000)(0.0000)(0.0000)
District FEXXXX
ControlsXXXX
Observations3,0203,02024,40414,9457,099
R20.4180.4380.3240.3380.407
  • Notes: DLHS sample of mothers who responded to the fertility survey. The outcome variable is a binary indicator for whether a mother desired a son at the next birth. The controls are the number of daughters from previous births, mother’s age, education, religion, caste, and a proxy for household wealth. p-values based on CR standard errors in parentheses.