Table 9

Native Labor Market Outcomes by Education and Occupation

Upper-SecondaryTertiary
STEMNon-STEMSTEMNon-STEM
(1)(2)(3)(4)
Panel A: ln Gross Hourly Wage Rate of Natives
30min * 2002–20060.003−0.0080.0190.022
(0.005)(0.006)(0.012)(0.021)
30min * 2008–20100.004−0.0090.0120.041
(0.006)(0.007)(0.016)(0.026)
Mean outcome0.0010.0010.003−0.001
SD outcome0.0520.0790.0700.089
Commuting zones10610698100
Within 30 min35353335
N848848766791
Panel B: Share of Natives in a Managerial Position
30min * 2002–20060.004−0.006−0.0200.053***
(0.006)(0.005)(0.031)(0.016)
30min * 2008–20100.002−0.010−0.0320.032
(0.007)(0.006)(0.034)(0.022)
Mean outcome−0.0000.000−0.007−0.001
SD outcome0.0280.0320.1300.113
Commuting zones10610698101
Within 30 min35353335
N848848766798
Panel C: ln Number of Natives Employed
30min * 2002–2006−0.0490.0120.0470.097
(0.048)(0.048)(0.078)(0.083)
30min * 2008–2010−0.0850.057−0.1380.077
(0.055)(0.068)(0.090)(0.118)
Mean outcome8.0598.6706.7267.407
SD outcome0.9081.2241.3931.598
Commuting zones10610698101
Within 30 min35353335
N848848766798
  • Source: SESS.

  • Notes: The table shows difference-in-differences estimates using biennial data at the commuting zone level for the period 1996–2010. The sample consists of employees aged 18–40. The dependent variable in Panel A is the mean natural log of gross hourly wage of natives (residualized) in an education–occupation category, in Panel B the share of natives holding at least a middle management position (residualized) in an education–occupation category, and in Panel C the natural log of number of natives employed in education–occupation category. Observations are weighed by the number of upper-secondary educated native employees in 1996 in Columns 1–2 and tertiary educated native employees in 1996 in Columns 3–4. Standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the commuting zone level. *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < .01.