2010 | 2012 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Panel A: Distribution of Agents | ||||
Agent availability (indicator) | 0.166 | 0.372 | 0.519 | 0.500 |
Distance to nearest agent (km) | 23.998 | 37.193 | 6.162 | 11.241 |
Cost to nearest agent (2000 TZS) | 1.850 | 3.037 | 0.667 | 1.316 |
Agent availability (indicators): | ||||
2-km radius | 0.272 | 0.445 | 0.598 | 0.490 |
5-km radius | 0.394 | 0.489 | 0.675 | 0.468 |
10-km radius | 0.521 | 0.500 | 0.816 | 0.387 |
15-km radius | 0.571 | 0.495 | 0.873 | 0.333 |
20-km radius | 0.616 | 0.487 | 0.899 | 0.301 |
Panel B: Household Mobile Money Composition | ||||
Mobile money (indicator) | 0.107 | 0.309 | 0.322 | 0.467 |
Mobile money accounts per capita | 0.032 | 0.119 | 0.105 | 0.232 |
Mobile money companies used: | ||||
M-Pesa | 0.103 | 0.304 | 0.228 | 0.420 |
Z-Pesa | 0.003 | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.058 |
Zap | 0.003 | 0.058 | 0.040 | 0.196 |
Tigo | 0.130 | 0.336 | ||
Panel C: Frequency of Use | ||||
Occasional (emergency) | 0.624 | 0.485 | 0.554 | 0.497 |
Half-yearly | 0.016 | 0.126 | 0.023 | 0.149 |
Quarterly | 0.088 | 0.284 | 0.049 | 0.217 |
Monthly | 0.144 | 0.352 | 0.182 | 0.386 |
Fortnightly | 0.052 | 0.222 | 0.051 | 0.219 |
Weekly | 0.060 | 0.238 | 0.096 | 0.295 |
Daily | 0.016 | 0.126 | 0.045 | 0.208 |
Panel D: Use by Transaction Type | ||||
Buy airtime | 0.085 | 0.279 | 0.082 | 0.275 |
Send airtime | 0.004 | 0.064 | 0.004 | 0.063 |
Send money | 0.375 | 0.485 | 0.310 | 0.463 |
Receive money | 0.435 | 0.497 | 0.497 | 0.500 |
Receive payment for sales | 0.008 | 0.090 | 0.020 | 0.141 |
Save for emergency | 0.032 | 0.177 | 0.031 | 0.173 |
Daily expense | 0.060 | 0.239 | 0.047 | 0.212 |
Large purchase | 0.008 | 0.090 |
Notes: Number of observations: 2,338 households. In Panel A, we present information on the distribution of mobile money agents across communities over the two waves. Agent availability is an indicator variable for the presence of an agent within the enumeration area. Cost to nearest agent is calculated based on travel cost given in the LSMS-ISA survey. Agent availability is also presented for different radiuses around the village center. Panel B of the table reports summary statistics of mobile money accounts used by the households across the two surveys. The first entry reports the fraction of households with at least one mobile money account. The second entry reports number of mobile money accounts per capita, and lastly we report the different service providers adopted by households (MM provider Tigo was not yet operational in 2010). Panel C presents the frequency of use of mobile money services as a fraction of adopter households by year. Panel D reports the most frequent uses of mobile money services. This shows the overall most important uses of mobile money services by users as a fraction of all adopter households by year. In the 2010 LSMS-ISA survey wave “large purchase” was not listed as possible answer.